Journal #2
A Portrait of the
Artist as a Young Man is a story like that of which I have never read
before. I’m still not sure whether I like it or not. As always, Joyce’s prose
is something to marvel at, but the stream of consciousness technique he employs
gets a little…nauseating at times. Well, maybe not nauseating, but it can
certainly get confusing. The narrator is unreliable, and he goes off on tangents
about seemingly nothing. The whole story seems to be about the main character,
Stephen Dedalus, and how he is just completely different from everyone else.
He seems to be fascinated with words and in this way could represent Joyce’s
own fascination with words. He is always sounding them out in his head, or
making ditties out of them, or thinking up poems. In a way one could argue that
Joyce’s writing deploys style over substance, and they might actually be right.
After spending a summer reading Dickens’ Tale
of Two Cities, switching to James Joyce is a bit like studying Bach’s Art
of Fugue and then jumping right into some sort of free-form jazz. Sure Dickens,
like Bach, likes to flex his stylistic muscles in his works, but the reader is
ever mindful of exactly where the story is going and although some tough
vocabulary is used, it is never confusing. With Joyce however, half the time it
seems the story is going nowhere and the other half you realize the story has
moved quite a bit without you even noticing. However, when you read Joyce you realize
that it becomes impossible to say plot is the key part of literature. The
artistic element comes from all of the other aspects. This is another way Joyce
has rather blown my mind. Before now, I considered the actual plot to be the be
all and end all of a novel. I find myself reading slower now – really paying
attention to what is being said, and although it is a very different book than
what I’m used to, I think I like it.
No comments:
Post a Comment